Queerness and the Specters of Class and Sexuality in Nella Larsen’s Fiction
Katharina Bunzmann FAU Erlangen
This
paper is part of my dissertation project in which I examine the representation
of class in American literature between the 1920s and 40s. In particular, I
focus on the writings of Ellen Glasgow, Meridel Le Sueur, Nella Larsen, and
Dorothy West. The goal of my project is threefold:
-
Firstly, I will suggest that class can be a meaningful category of analysis
regarding almost any kind of literature, regardless of whether the relevance of
class is strongly emphasized as in the genre working-class fiction or not.
-
Secondly, in accordance with the mainstream treatment of class I believe that
class can only be analyzed in a meaningful way if examined in its
interrelationships with race, gender, and sexual orientation; however, in
opposition to many „race, class, gender”- analyses I will make
class the focus of my analysis.
-
Thirdly, I argue for a new concept of class identity that is in tune with the
anti-essentialist notions that have come to dominate the treatment of race,
gender, and sexual orientation. Thus, I hope to offer an alternative to the
limiting traditional, orthodox class analyses and to open up fresh new ways of
looking at class in a large variety of texts.
In
this paper, I will focus on the connections between class and sexuality in
Nella Larsen’s
Quicksand.
The
metaphor of borderlands, of challenging and crossing boundaries, as presented
for instance in Gloria Anzaldúa's
Borderlands/La
Frontera
,
has been widely adapted among literary critics. Anzaldúa defines the
Borderlands as being "physically present wherever two or more cultures edge
each other, where people of different races occupy the same territory, where
under, lower, middle and upper classes touch." I submit that one region of the
Borderlands mentioned in her definition is neglected in comparison to cultures,
race and sexuality, and that is class. As I will argue in my analysis of Nella
Larsen's
Quicksand
(written in 1928), I believe class would benefit from being understood as a
potential borderland region.
Put
briefly, I will argue that in Nella Larsen's fiction the stereotypical
oppositions
of
hetero/homosexuality and of the upper versus the lower classes are
interrogated. This challenge is embodied by "queer" characters who are "queer"
regarding both sexuality and class. These characters' class affiliations are
unstable and their sexuality is not purely heterosexual. All attempts to ban
these queer elements are condemned to failure because the queer elements are
always present
and
absent.
One
of the key terms I will use in my analysis is ”spectrality.”
”Spectral" can be read as being derived from either "specter" or
"spectrum," and, as I’ll explain in the following, I will apply both
meanings to class as well as sexuality.
1
Sexuality / Specter:
Regarding
sexuality, the term "spectral" can suggest that homosexuality or lesbianism are
threatening specters feared by the heterosexual mainstream, an idea expressed
for example by Terry Castle in her book
The
Apparitional Lesbian
.
With regard to literary criticism, the specter metaphor could explain why
Gloria T. Hull said about lesbian literature that “[f]or the sensitive
reader, there is often a gap between what one knows and what can be 'proved'".
In this context, lesbianism could be seen as a specter haunting the text as
well as the critic because it is so hard to lay hands on and pin down.
2
Sexuality / Spectrum
Sexuality
can also be said to be spectral in the sense of a spectrum of sexual
orientations. This spectrum of sexuality is to some extent similar to Adrienne
Rich's "lesbian continuum." However, the advantage of the term
“spectral” is that it does not evoke the idea of lesbian sex and
can thus be applied to a broader range of relationships. Apart from that, the
term "spectral sexuality" can be applied to men as well as women, for instance,
it could be applied to both female characters
and
to Brian Redfield in
Passing.
3
Class / Specter
Similarly
to sexuality, class could be seen as haunting literary critics because many
feel highly uncomfortable faced with this ideologically charged and little
theorized term.
Furthermore,
the specter metaphor could be applied to certain classes perceived as threats,
for instance, the nineteenth-century so-called "dangerous classes." These
"dangerous classes" were thought to consist of such people as "criminals" and
"savages" (read: "Negroes, Indians, Mexicans, Irish"). It was hoped that they
would soon disappear in Darwinian fashion, thus giving way to a "younger,
fresher civilization." In my dissertation project I hope to show that the fear
of certain dangerous classes has persisted far into the twentieth century.
4
Class / Spectrum
By
connecting ”class” and ”spectrum,” I’d like to
draw attention to the fact that class systems are much more multifaceted,
differentiated and permeable than traditional Marxist theories assume. This
thesis can be illustrated for example by describing how the protagonist of
Quicksand
moves back and forth on the class spectrum during the course of the novel.
Queerness
Apart
from spectrality, the second key term I will use is queerness. I will use
”spectrality” in an abstract sense to refer to
phenomena
such as lesbianism, for example, whereas ”queer” is meant to refer
to concrete manifestations of this spectrality in individual people.
Loosely
following the Merriam Webster, I use ”queerness” not just as
referring to homosexuality but rather in five different ways, as indicated on
my transparency: queerness can denote strangeness, shadiness, physical disease,
mental instability, and homosexuality, or, as I would put it, spectral
sexuality. In the following, I will illustrate how specters, spectra, and
queerness function in
Quicksand.
Queer
as Strange
From
the outset of
Quicksand,
Helga Crane, the protagonist, is an eternal outsider. She seems strange, queer
to other people. For example, people in the South regard her and the bright
colors she wears as “queer” because Helga deviates from the usually
worn dark colors. While most others wear navy blue, black, or brown (17), Helga
believes that "bright colours
were
fitting
and that dark-complexioned people
should
wear yellow, green, and red" (18). Her bright colors, among others, indicate
that Helga is a hopeless misfit due to the fact that she moves between
different social and racial groups.
Queer
as Shady
Helga appears shady due to her movements on the class spectrum. Originally, she
comes from lower class origins and does not even have family, a stigma in black
upper class circles. Thus, when in touch with people from the upper-classes,
Helga is viewed with suspicion. For a while, she is engaged to a member of the
black upper classes. This experience teaches her that "Negro society . . .[is]
as complicated and rigid in its ramifications as the highest strata of white
society" (8). Those at the top of the social ladder would like to ban the
specter of the lower classes from their precincts. (
Transparency:
A
nice illustration of the self-confidence and self-understanding of the black
upper classes is this famous portrait of two African Americans in raccoon coats
in front of an expensive car.)
As becomes clear in the above quotation about "Negro society," Larsen’s
picture of American society and its class system is highly complex: she is not
content to paint a black-and-white picture of the relations between blacks and
whites but also exposes the internal classism
within
the black community.
Queer
as Spectral Sexuality
Class
is not the only specter and cause of queerness in
Quicksand.
The other one is spectral sexuality. Helga’s problem, and that of the
narrator and reader, is that her spectral sexuality is so specter-like that it
can hardly be “proved,” as Gloria T. Hull put it. Nevertheless, all
hints at Helga’s spectral sexuality taken together do give a fairly
consistent picture.
The
strongest evidence of her spectral sexuality is related to Helga's corporality:
Queerness
in the shape of physical disease functions as an indicator of spectral
sexuality, itself another shape of queerness. Thus, queerness proves to be a
complex, interrelated phenomenon. The relation between corporality and
sexuality in
Quicksand
brings to mind Foucault's theories; using his terminology, it could be argued
that the regulatory discourse of heterosexuality leaves its traces even when it
is so subtle (yet pervasive) that it goes unnoticed. Although she does not
become aware of it, Helga’s physical disease occurs consistently when
confronted with heterosexuality, especially its institutionalized form,
marriage. The most obvious example would be her almost fatal sickness at the
end of the novel, when she is completely exhausted from bearing too many
children.
Yet,
we find many subtle hints before this catastrophe. For example, when her aunt
wants to pressure her into marrying. Helga's body reacts in the following way:
"Her whole body was tense with suppressed indignation. Burning inside like the
confined fire of a hot furnace. . . And suddenly she was oddly cold. An
intimidation of things distant, but none the less disturbing, oppressed her
with a faintly sick feeling. Like a heavy weight, a stone weight, just where,
she knew, was her stomach" (80). As this quotation shows, Helga’s body
recognizes most sensitively the negative consequences of the repression of her
spectral sexual identity. Consciously, Helga will never arrive at an awareness
of her spectral sexuality; however, similarly to her body, her
psyche
also suffers from this repression.
This
emotional and mental instability Helga suffers from is a further indicator of
her repressed spectral sexuality. Heterosexual relationships are extremely
problematic for her. Thus, she breaks off her engagement. She
does
engage in at least one heterosexual relationship afterwards. However, Helga
does not feel comfortable in any of these relationships. After learning that
all men she encounters are not really interested in her anyway and don’t
take her seriously, she feels completely broken mentally as well as physically.
Her condition worsens so much that Helga finally borders on hysteria, a state
that leads to her religious conversion and disastrous marriage. In the end,
Helga will be so broken mentally that she cannot even muster up enough energy
to escape from her marital trap.
In
my view, Helga’s physical as well as mental uneasiness taken together
form a strong hint at her spectral sexuality. If, as I argue, Helga’s
sexuality is spectral, what makes it so hard, in fact impossible, for her to
realize it? One reason that I will illustrate below is related to class.
However, there is also one other reason worth mention in passing, and that is
race.
To
the African American community (and, in fact, other racial minorities as well),
the specter of homosexuality or lesbianism has always been even more
threatening than to the white community. In a sense, class and race go hand in
hand here: African Americans have always felt that they need to meet social
expectations (such as the rejection of homosexuality) particularly strictly in
order to reach or maintain social acceptance. A textbook example of homophobia
at Larsen’s time is W.E.B. Du Bois’s critique of Claude
McKay’s
Home
to Harlem
,
in which McKay describes gay and lesbian night bars. Du Bois writes that
“McKay has set out to cater for that prurient demand on the part of white
folks for a portrayal in Negroes of . . . utter licentiousness . . . He has
used every art and emphasis to paint drunkenness, fighting, lascivious sexual
promiscuity and utter absence of restraint in as bold and bright colors as he
can". Shifting to the present, it has to be mentioned that this particularly
strong abhorrence of spectral sexuality among African Americans is not history,
as the debate about lesbianism in Alice Walker's
The
Color Purple
has shown.
Connections
between Class and Sexuality
Having
described how class and sexuality can function both as specter and spectra, the
final part of my paper will examine in what ways spectral sexuality, sexuality
in general, and class are interconnected. Drawing on
Quicksand,
I'll suggest that the middle and upper classes tend to regard sensuality and
spectral sexuality as threatening specters “materialized,” so to
speak, through the lower classes. Theoretically, I draw on Pierre Bourdieu here
who suggests in
Distinctions
that the lower classes are associated with corporality to a greater extent than
the middle or upper classes. Thus, while the lower classes have less to lose in
terms of social status, they enjoy greater freedom in sexual matters. I will
first give two illustrations of the upper-class attitude toward sexuality, and
then turn to lower-class sexuality.
The
first illustration of the upper-class attitude toward sexuality is the concept
of ladyhood that a lady explains to Helga. It turns out that ladyhood condemns
women very much to an asexual existence, even in case they get married. The
second illustration is provided through Anne, one of Helga’s upper-class
friends in New York. Anne, who is described as Madonna-like by the narrator,
turns out to be exactly such an asexual, well-mannered lady of the kind that
Helga abhors. In her aversion to sexuality, Anne even goes so far as attempting
to save her spouse, Dr. Anderson, from what she perceives as his animalistic
"nameless . . shameful" sexual impulses (95).
These
"nameless . . shameful” impulses that the middle and upper classes deny
in themselves can be found mainly in two spaces in
Quicksand:
among low-class, religious Southerners and in night clubs.
The
Southerners and Helga have one thing in common: their sensuality. This Southern
sensuality is illustrated for example through an orgy-like religious service.
Significantly, most Southerners Helga meets belong to the lower classes, which
can be concluded from their strong accents and their lack of cultivation and
taste, at least in Helga's opinion. However, if Helga and the Southerners
share
their alleged sensuality, there are also insurmountable differences between
them. Thus, Larsen complicates the simplistic stereotype of lower-class
sensuality. It is highly ironic that Helga - herself from lower-class origin,
yet trying to surmount it through education - ends up - of
all
places - in the rural, ultra-conservative, religious South, where a woman is
only told to “trust the Lord more fully” (124) when she is
completely exhausted from her domestic chores.
The
second
space where the ”nameless, shameful” impulses can be located are
night clubs. Helga stops by at a Harlem night club, where lascivious music is
played and wild dancing takes place. It is important to note here that the
Harlem night clubs carried a paradox quality: many of their customers were
upper-class
blacks
and
whites who indulged in the feeling of being close to some kind of authentic,
low-class black folk culture. The textbook example of this black folk culture
and its appropriation is the blues. However, the blues is associated not only
with this low-class origin but also with a liberal treatment of sexuality, of
hetero- as well as homosexuality.
Regardless
how much some African Americans tried to deny it, there was a thriving gay and
lesbian scene in Harlem at the time.
One
place where it could be found was among intellectuals, e.g., writers. The
other
place where spectral sexuality could be frequently found was among entertainers
and singers. Examples would be the blues singers Ma Rainey, George Hannah or
Bessie Smith. The average black middle-class woman could only dream of
expressing her spectral sexuality as unabashedly as George Hannah put it: "I
know women that don't like men.// The way they do is a crying sin.// It's dirty
but good, oh yes, it's dirty but good". Neither Helga nor the women characters
in
Passing
ever arrive at such an affirmation of their spectral sexual identities. The
blues singers, however, were thought to possess greater sexual freedom than the
black middle and upper classes because their music - originating in the rural
southern folk culture - was ascribed not only a low-class status but also
stereotypical notions of primitivism. During the night club scene, these
primitivist stereotypes are evoked when Helga reminds herself that she is no
"jungle creature" (59), thus distancing herself from the sensual music and
emphasizing her present upper-class affiliation.
Conclusion
Let
me wrap up. I have argued that Helga is a queer element regarding both class
and sexuality, two categories interconnected in numerous ways. Regarding both
class and sexuality, Helga defies simplistic categorization. As a sensual,
well-educated person, she remains a shady element
both
among the civilized, asexual upper classes
and
among the sensual rural low-class Southerners, who would never condone any
sensuality outside heterosexuality. Nevertheless, Helga
does
live among both groups for certain periods of time. Therefore, the specters of
class and sexuality as "materialized" through queer people
are
present, though believed to be absent. Larsen uses this metaphor of presence
and absence herself in
Passing
when describing Clare Kendry - a queer figure like Helga - as "though absent .
. . still present" (224). By describing how Helga moves specter-like in the
borderlands of class and sexuality I hope to have made a convincing case for
the interconnectedness of class and sexuality.
|